Sabine Fave Cadeau
|
Divya CherianPh.D.: Columbia University
Divya Cherian grew up in New Delhi, India, intrigued by the past that lived on around her in the ruins that dot the city’s landscape. She completed her undergraduate studies in history at the University of Delhi, followed by a master’s degree and an M.Phil. in medieval Indian history at Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. She wrote her M.Phil. dissertation on the interaction between the hill-dwelling Mer, Meena, and Bhil communities and the eighteenth-century Rathor state in western India. She completed her Ph.D. at the Department of History, Columbia University in 2015, writing about the relationship between merchants, the state, and Krishnite devotion in eighteenth century western India. Dr. Cherian's research examines the role of the ethic of ahimsa (non-violence) in the crystallization of a new community of elites in the western Indian kingdom of Marwar in the eighteenth century. The valorization of non-violence translated most notably into a concern with the preservation of non-human lives, leading to an emphasis upon a vegetarian diet. Based on a reading of the legislative archive of the Rathor state, which governed Marwar at the time, she argues that the moral principles of non-violence and of vegetarianism played a central role in the development of new forms of community and state, uncovering the coercive and deeply political nature of these processes. She traces these changes in the context of the dissolution of the Mughal Empire, the growing influence of European trading companies, the emergence of new social groups, and the rise of new state forms. In doing so, she explores the interconnections between ethics, law, local politics, and the history of caste and community in South Asia. While at the RCHA, she will be working to complete a book manuscript, entitled Ordering Subjects: Merchants, the State, and Krishna Devotion in Eighteenth-Century Western India, that is based on this research. |
Chris Finley
|
Özge Serin
Postdoctoral Fellow
Ph.D.: Columbia University
Özge Serin holds a Ph.D. in Anthropology from Columbia University. Her research and writing focus on forms of radical politics and cultures of confinement in contemporary Turkey. She is concerned with questions of the relation between violence and the political; temporality and sovereignty; death and the event; political subjectivity and desire; ethics and withdrawal; language, idiom and translation. Serin is the recipient of a number of fellowships, including Harry Frank Guggenheim Dissertation Award, The Interdisciplinary Center for Innovative Theory and Empirics Andrew Mellon Fellowship, and Columbia University Middle East Institute Dissertation Fellowship. She is the co-editor (with Nergis Ertürk) of a forthcoming special issue of boundary 2 entitled Marxism, Communism, and Translation. Her publications include “The Use-Value of Idioms: The Language of Marxism and Language As Such” forthcoming in boundary 2 and “Egemen Çöküş: Ölüm Orucu ve Siyasal” forthcoming in Kampfplatz. As a companion to her book project, Serin has also completed (with Brian Karl) an experimental documentary Death/Fast. References to and reproduction of stills from Death/Fast are included in the introduction to the volume Experimental Film and Anthropology. At the RCHA, Serin will be completing her book entitled Writing of Death: Ethics and Politics of the Death Fast in Turkey. Part ethnography, part philosophical speculation, part historical narrative, part literary reading, Writing of Death focuses on the seven-year-long mass hunger strike undertaken by prisoners affiliated with outlawed Marxist-Leninist organizations in Turkey. Engaged in conversation with surviving hunger strikers, ex-political prisoners, their families, medical and forensic doctors, and enriched by textual and visual analysis of prison memoirs, diaries, correspondence, testaments, last speeches, and photographs, Writing of Death scrutinizes the political ontology of the hunger strike to draw forth the ambiguity of the right to death—an ambiguity that has been ignored by performative theories of violence—by figuring death as both radical possibility and impossibility. Accounting for the extraordinarily long duration of the prison movement (7 years) and self-starvation period before death (up to 558 days) by examining its temporal and organizational logics, Writing of Death reveals the inescapable anachrony between two deaths—the passage of time that separates and draws together death as possibility from death as an anonymous event which comes either too early or late—as the site of radical alterity. It is therefore concerned with the rift between death and political space borne by the death faster whose unnamable body carries elsewhere, transforms, in a word, translates “All” that is not included within politico-juridical sovereignty. Displacing the critical gaze from political space to the space of dying, from the symbolics of martyrdom to the survivors afflicted with amnesia, Writing of Death accentuates the dissolution of the political subject to make a discreet gesture towards an ante-theological as well as an anti-theological concept of the political. |

